Beliefs, Emotions, Feelings, Mindset, Mood
Feelings, Emotions, Human relationships
The Guardian p. 3 10
have a super bad
feeling about N
mixed feelings USA
'that sinking feeling' UK
hard feelings USA
Illustration: Nicole Xu for NPR
Don't Do What I Do:
How Getting Out Of Sync Can Help
July 16, 2016
7:00 AM ET
black mood UK
go through N
be through N
come to terms with N
outburst of emotion
be overwhelmed with emotion
overwhelming emotion > grief
emotional state USA
emotional skills USA
emotional toll USA
emotional public displays
emotionally wrenching N
Corpus of news articles
Mining the Web for Feelings,
August 24, 2009
The New York Times
By ALEX WRIGHT
Computers may be good at crunching numbers, but can they crunch feelings?
The rise of blogs and social networks has fueled a bull market in personal
opinion: reviews, ratings, recommendations and other forms of online expression.
For computer scientists, this fast-growing mountain of data is opening a
tantalizing window onto the collective consciousness of Internet users.
An emerging field known as sentiment analysis is taking shape around one of the
computer world’s unexplored frontiers: translating the vagaries of human emotion
into hard data.
This is more than just an interesting programming exercise. For many businesses,
online opinion has turned into a kind of virtual currency that can make or break
a product in the marketplace.
Yet many companies struggle to make sense of the caterwaul of complaints and
compliments that now swirl around their products online. As sentiment analysis
tools begin to take shape, they could not only help businesses improve their
bottom lines, but also eventually transform the experience of searching for
Several new sentiment analysis companies are trying to tap into the growing
business interest in what is being said online.
“Social media used to be this cute project for 25-year-old consultants,” said
Margaret Francis, vice president for product at Scout Labs in San Francisco.
Now, she said, top executives “are recognizing it as an incredibly rich vein of
Scout Labs, which is backed by the venture capital firm started by the CNet
founder Halsey Minor, recently introduced a subscription service that allows
customers to monitor blogs, news articles, online forums and social networking
sites for trends in opinions about products, services or topics in the news.
In early May, the ticket marketplace StubHub used Scout Labs’ monitoring tool to
identify a sudden surge of negative blog sentiment after rain delayed a
Yankees-Red Sox game.
Stadium officials mistakenly told hundreds of fans that the game had been
canceled, and StubHub denied fans’ requests for refunds, on the grounds that the
game had actually been played. But after spotting trouble brewing online, the
company offered discounts and credits to the affected fans. It is now
re-evaluating its bad weather policy.
“This is a canary in a coal mine for us,” said John Whelan, StubHub’s director
of customer service.
Jodange, based in Yonkers, offers a service geared toward online publishers that
lets them incorporate opinion data drawn from over 450,000 sources, including
mainstream news sources, blogs and Twitter.
Based on research by Claire Cardie, a former Cornell computer science professor,
and Jan Wiebe of the University of Pittsburgh, the service uses a sophisticated
algorithm that not only evaluates sentiments about particular topics, but also
identifies the most influential opinion holders.
Jodange, whose early investors include the National Science Foundation, is
currently working on a new algorithm that could use opinion data to predict
future developments, like forecasting the impact of newspaper editorials on a
company’s stock price.
In a similar vein, The Financial Times recently introduced Newssift, an
experimental program that tracks sentiments about business topics in the news,
coupled with a specialized search engine that allows users to organize their
queries by topic, organization, place, person and theme.
Using Newssift, a search for Wal-Mart reveals that recent sentiment about the
company is running positive by a ratio of slightly better than two to one. When
that search is refined with the suggested term “Labor Force and Unions,”
however, the ratio of positive to negative sentiments drops closer to one to
Such tools could help companies pinpoint the effect of specific issues on
customer perceptions, helping them respond with appropriate marketing and public
For casual Web surfers, simpler incarnations of sentiment analysis are sprouting
up in the form of lightweight tools like Tweetfeel, Twendz and Twitrratr. These
sites allow users to take the pulse of Twitter users about particular topics.
A quick search on Tweetfeel, for example, reveals that 77 percent of recent
tweeters liked the movie “Julie & Julia.” But the same search on Twitrratr
reveals a few misfires. The site assigned a negative score to a tweet reading
“julie and julia was truly delightful!!” That same message ended with “we all
felt very hungry afterwards” — and the system took the word “hungry” to indicate
a negative sentiment.
While the more advanced algorithms used by Scout Labs, Jodange and Newssift
employ advanced analytics to avoid such pitfalls, none of these services works
perfectly. “Our algorithm is about 70 to 80 percent accurate,” said Ms. Francis,
who added that its users can reclassify inaccurate results so the system learns
from its mistakes.
Translating the slippery stuff of human language into binary values will always
be an imperfect science, however. “Sentiments are very different from
conventional facts,” said Seth Grimes, the founder of the suburban Maryland
consulting firm Alta Plana, who points to the many cultural factors and
linguistic nuances that make it difficult to turn a string of written text into
a simple pro or con sentiment. “ ‘Sinful’ is a good thing when applied to
chocolate cake,” he said.
The simplest algorithms work by scanning keywords to categorize a statement as
positive or negative, based on a simple binary analysis (“love” is good, “hate”
is bad). But that approach fails to capture the subtleties that bring human
language to life: irony, sarcasm, slang and other idiomatic expressions.
Reliable sentiment analysis requires parsing many linguistic shades of gray.
“We are dealing with sentiment that can be expressed in subtle ways,” said Bo
Pang, a researcher at Yahoo who co-wrote “Opinion Mining and Sentiment
Analysis,” one of the first academic books on sentiment analysis.
To get at the true intent of a statement, Ms. Pang developed software that looks
at several different filters, including polarity (is the statement positive or
negative?), intensity (what is the degree of emotion being expressed?) and
subjectivity (how partial or impartial is the source?).
For example, a preponderance of adjectives often signals a high degree of
subjectivity, while noun- and verb-heavy statements tend toward a more neutral
point of view.
As sentiment analysis algorithms grow more sophisticated, they should begin to
yield more accurate results that may eventually point the way to more
sophisticated filtering mechanisms. They could become a part of everyday Web
“I see sentiment analysis becoming a standard feature of search engines,” said
Mr. Grimes, who suggests that such algorithms could begin to influence both
general-purpose Web searching and more specialized searches in areas like
e-commerce, travel reservations and movie reviews.
Ms. Pang envisions a search engine that fine-tunes results for users based on
sentiment. For example, it might influence the ordering of search results for
certain kinds of queries like “best hotel in San Antonio.”
As search engines begin to incorporate more and more opinion data into their
results, the distinction between fact and opinion may start blurring to the
point where, as David Byrne once put it, “facts all come with points of view.”
Mining the Web for
Feelings, Not Facts,
How we learned to stop having fun
We used to know how to get together
and really let our hair down.
the early 1600s,
a mass epidemic of depression broke out
- and we've been living
with it ever since.
Something went wrong, but what?
the causes of our unhappiness
Monday April 2, 2007
Beginning in England in the 17th century, the European world was stricken by
what looks, in today's terms, like an epidemic of depression. The disease
attacked both young and old, plunging them into months or years of morbid
lethargy and relentless terrors, and seemed - perhaps only because they wrote
more and had more written about them - to single out men of accomplishment and
genius. The puritan writer John Bunyan, the political leader Oliver Cromwell,
the poets Thomas Gray and John Donne, and the playwright and essayist Samuel
Johnson are among the earliest and best-known victims. To the medical
profession, the illness presented a vexing conundrum, not least because its
gravest outcome was suicide. In 1733, Dr George Cheyne speculated that the
English climate, combined with sedentary lifestyles and urbanisation, "have
brought forth a class of distemper with atrocious and frightful symptoms, scarce
known to our ancestors, and never rising to such fatal heights, and afflicting
such numbers in any known nation. These nervous disorders being computed to make
almost one-third of the complaints of the people of condition in England."
To the English, the disease was "the English malady". But the rainy British
Isles were not the only site visited by the disease; all of Europe was
The disease grew increasingly prevalent over the course of the 20th century,
when relatively sound statistics first became available, and this increase
cannot be accounted for by a greater willingness on the part of physicians and
patients to report it. Rates of schizophrenia, panic disorders and phobias did
not rise at the same time, for example, as they would be expected to if only
changes in the reporting of mental illness were at work. According to the World
Health Organisation, depression is now the fifth leading cause of death and
disability in the world, while ischemic heart disease trails in sixth place.
Fatalities occur most dramatically through suicide, but even the mild form of
depression - called dysthemia and characterised by an inability to experience
pleasure - can kill by increasing a person's vulnerability to serious somatic
illnesses such as cancer and heart disease. Far from being an affliction of the
famous and successful, we now know that the disease strikes the poor more often
than the rich, and women more commonly than men.
Just in the past few years, hundreds of books, articles and television specials
have been devoted to depression: its toll on the individual, its relationship to
gender, the role of genetic factors, the efficacy of pharmaceutical treatments.
But to my knowledge, no one has suggested that the epidemic may have begun in a
particular historical time, and started as a result of cultural circumstances
that arose at that time and have persisted or intensified since. The failure to
consider historical roots may stem, in part, from the emphasis on the celebrity
victims of the past, which tends to discourage a statistical, or
epidemiological, perspective. But if there was, in fact, a beginning to the
epidemic of depression, sometime in the 16th or 17th century, it confronts us
with this question: could this apparent decline in the ability to experience
pleasure be in any way connected with the decline in opportunities for pleasure,
such as carnival and other traditional festivities?
There is reason to think that something like an epidemic of depression in fact
began around 1600, or the time when the Anglican minister Robert Burton
undertook his "anatomy" of the disease, published as The Anatomy of Melancholy
in 1621. Melancholy, as it was called until the 20th century, is of course a
very ancient problem, and was described in the fifth century BC by Hippocrates.
Chaucer's 14th-century characters were aware of it, and late-medieval churchmen
knew it as "acedia". So melancholy, in some form, had always existed - and,
regrettably, we have no statistical evidence of a sudden increase in early
modern Europe, which had neither a psychiatric profession to do the diagnosing
nor a public health establishment to record the numbers of the afflicted. All we
know is that in the 1600s and 1700s, medical books about melancholy and
literature with melancholic themes were both finding an eager audience,
presumably at least in part among people who suffered from melancholy
Increasing interest in melancholy is not, however, evidence of an increase in
the prevalence of actual melancholy. As the historian Roy Porter suggested, the
disease may simply have been becoming more stylish, both as a medical diagnosis
and as a problem, or pose, affected by the idle rich, and signifying a certain
ennui or detachment. No doubt the medical prejudice that it was a disease of the
gifted, or at least of the comfortable, would have made it an attractive
diagnosis to the upwardly mobile and merely out-of-sorts.
But melancholy did not become a fashionable pose until a full century after
Burton took up the subject, and when it did become stylish, we must still
wonder: why did this particular stance or attitude become fashionable and not
another? An arrogant insouciance might, for example, seem more fitting to an age
of imperialism than this wilting, debilitating malady; and enlightenment,
another well-known theme of the era, might have been better served by a mood of
Nor can we be content with the claim that the apparent epidemic of melancholy
was the cynical invention of the men who profited by writing about it, since
some of these were self-identified sufferers themselves. Robert Burton
confessed, "I writ of melancholy, by being busy to avoid melancholy." George
Cheyne was afflicted, though miraculously cured by a vegetarian diet of his own
devising. The Englishman John Brown, who published a bestselling
mid-19th-century book on the subject, went on to commit suicide. Something was
happening, from about 1600 on, to make melancholy a major concern of the reading
public, and the simplest explanation is that there was more melancholy around to
be concerned about.
And very likely the phenomena of this early "epidemic of depression" and the
suppression of communal rituals and festivities are entangled in various ways.
It could be, for example, that, as a result of their illness, depressed
individuals lost their taste for communal festivities and even came to view them
with revulsion. But there are other possibilities. First, that both the rise of
depression and the decline of festivities are symptomatic of some deeper,
underlying psychological change, which began about 400 years ago and persists,
in some form, in our own time. The second, more intriguing possibility is that
the disappearance of traditional festivities was itself a factor contributing to
One approaches the subject of "deeper, underlying psychological change" with
some trepidation, but fortunately, in this case, many respected scholars have
already visited this difficult terrain. "Historians of European culture are in
substantial agreement," Lionel Trilling wrote in 1972, "that in the late 16th
and early 17th centuries, something like a mutation in human nature took place."
This change has been called the rise of subjectivity or the discovery of the
inner self and since it can be assumed that all people, in all historical
periods, have some sense of selfhood and capacity for subjective reflection, we
are really talking about an intensification, and a fairly drastic one, of the
universal human capacity to face the world as an autonomous "I", separate from,
and largely distrustful of, "them". The European nobility had already undergone
this sort of psychological shift in their transformation from a warrior class to
a collection of courtiers, away from directness and spontaneity and toward a new
guardedness in relation to others. In the late 16th and 17th centuries, the
change becomes far more widespread, affecting even artisans, peasants, and
labourers. The new "emphasis on disengagement and selfconsciousness", as Louis
Sass puts it, makes the individual potentially more autonomous and critical of
existing social arrange-ments, which is all to the good. But it can also
transform the individual into a kind of walled fortress, carefully defended from
Historians infer this psychological shift from a number of concrete changes
occurring in the early modern period, first and most strikingly among the urban
bourgeoisie, or upper middle class. Mirrors in which to examine oneself become
popular among those who can afford them, along with self-portraits (Rembrandt
painted more than 50 of them) and autobiographies in which to revise and
elaborate the image that one has projected to others. In bourgeois homes, public
spaces that guests may enter are differentiated, for the first time, from the
private spaces - bedrooms, for example - in which one may retire to let down
one's guard and truly "be oneself". More decorous forms of entertainment - plays
and operas requiring people to remain immobilised, each in his or her separate
seat - begin to provide an alternative to the promiscuously interactive and
physically engaging pleasures of carnival. The very word "self", as Trilling
noted, ceases to be a mere reflexive or intensifier and achieves the status of a
freestanding noun, referring to some inner core, not readily visible to others.
The notion of a self hidden behind one's appearance and portable from one
situation to another is usually attributed to the new possibility of upward
mobility. In medieval culture, you were what you appeared to be - a peasant, a
man of commerce or an aristocrat - and any attempt to assume another status
would have been regarded as rank deception. But in the late 16th century, upward
mobility was beginning to be possible or at least imaginable, making "deception"
a widespread way of life. You might not be a lord or a lofty burgher, but you
could find out how to act like one. Hence the popularity, in 17th-century
England, of books instructing the would-be member of the gentry in how to
comport himself, write an impressive letter and choose a socially advantageous
Hence, too, the new fascination with the theatre, with its notion of an actor
who is different from his or her roles. This is a notion that takes some getting
used to; in the early years of the theatre, actors who played the part of
villains risked being assaulted by angry playgoers in the streets. Within the
theatre, there is a fascination with plots involving further deceptions:
Shakespeare's Portia pretends to be a doctor of law; Rosalind disguises herself
as a boy; Juliet feigns her own death. Writing a few years after Shakespeare's
death, Burton bemoaned the fact that acting was no longer confined to the
theatre, for "men like stage-players act [a] variety of parts". It was painful,
in his view, "to see a man turn himself into all shapes like a Chameleon ... to
act twenty parts & persons at once for his advantage ... having a several face,
garb, & character, for every one he meets". The inner self that can change
costumes and manners to suit the occasion resembles a skilled craftsperson, too
busy and watchful for the pleasures of easygoing conviviality. As for the outer
self projected by the inner one into the social world: who would want to "lose
oneself" in the communal excitement of carnival when that self has taken so much
effort and care to construct?
So highly is the "inner self" honoured within our own culture that its
acquisition seems to be an unquestionable mark of progress - a requirement, as
Trilling called it, for "the emergence of modern European and American man". It
was, no doubt, this sense of individuality and personal autonomy, "of an
untrammelled freedom to ask questions and explore", as the historian Yi-Fu Tuan
put it, that allowed men such as Martin Luther and Galileo to risk their lives
by defying Catholic doctrine. Which is preferable: a courageous, or even merely
grasping and competitive, individualism, versus a medieval (or, in the case of
non-European cultures, "primitive") personality so deeply mired in community and
ritual that it can barely distinguish a "self"? From the perspective of our own
time, the choice, so stated, is obvious. We have known nothing else.
But there was a price to be paid for the buoyant individualism we associate with
the more upbeat aspects of the early modern period, the Renaissance and
Enlightenment. As Tuan writes, "the obverse" of the new sense of personal
autonomy is "isolation, loneliness, a sense of disengagement, a loss of natural
vitality and of innocent pleasure in the givenness of the world, and a feeling
of burden because reality has no meaning other than what a person chooses to
impart to it". Now if there is one circumstance indisputably involved in the
etiology of depression, it is precisely this sense of isolation. As the
19th-century French sociologist Emile Durkheim saw it, "Originally society is
everything, the individual nothing ... But gradually things change. As societies
become greater in volume and density, individual differences multiply, and the
moment approaches when the only remaining bond among the members of a single
human group will be that they are all [human]." The flip side of the heroic
autonomy that is said to represent one of the great achievements of the early
modern and modern eras is radical isolation and, with it, depression and
But the new kind of personality that arose in 16th- and 17th-century Europe was
by no means as autonomous and self-defining as claimed. For far from being
detached from the immediate human environment, the newly self-centered
individual is continually preoccupied with judging the expectations of others
and his or her own success in meeting them: "How am I doing?" this supposedly
autonomous "self" wants to know. "What kind of an impression am I making?"
It is no coincidence that the concept of society emerges at the same time as the
concept of self. What seems most to concern the new and supposedly autonomous
self is the opinion of others, who in aggregate compose "society". Mirrors, for
example, do not show us our "selves", only what others can see, and
autobiographies reveal only what we want those others to know. The crushing
weight of other people's judgments - imagined or real - would help explain the
frequent onset of depression at the time of a perceived or anticipated failure.
In the 19th century, the historian Janet Oppenheim reports, "severely depressed
patients frequently revealed totally unwarranted fears of financial ruin or the
expectation of professional disgrace". This is not autonomy but dependency: the
emerging "self" defines its own worth in terms of the perceived judgments of
If depression was one result of the new individualism, the usual concomitant of
depression - anxiety - was surely another. It takes effort, as well as a great
deal of watchfulness, to second-guess other people's reactions and plot one's
words and gestures accordingly. For the scheming courtier, the striving burgher
and the ambitious lawyer or cleric of early modern Europe, the "self" they
discovered is perhaps best described as an awareness of this ceaseless, internal
effort to adjust one's behaviour to the expectations of others. Play in this
context comes to have a demanding new meaning, unconnected to pleasure, as in
"playing a role". No wonder bourgeois life becomes privatised in the 16th and
17th centuries, with bedrooms and studies to withdraw to, where, for a few hours
a day, the effort can be abandoned, the mask set aside.
But we cannot grasp the full psychological impact of this "mutation in human
nature" in purely secular terms. Four hundred - even 200 - years ago, most
people would have interpreted their feelings of isolation and anxiety through
the medium of religion, translating self as "soul"; the ever-watchful judgmental
gaze of others as "God"; and melancholy as "the gnawing fear of eternal
damnation". Catholicism offered various palliatives to the disturbed and
afflicted, in the form of rituals designed to win divine forgiveness or at least
diminished disapproval; and even Lutheranism, while rejecting most of the
rituals, posited an approachable and ultimately loving God.
Not so with the Calvinist version of Protestantism. Instead of offering relief,
Calvinism provided a metaphysical framework for depression: if you felt
isolated, persecuted and possibly damned, this was because you actually were.
John Bunyan seems to have been a jolly enough fellow in his youth, much given to
dancing and sports in the village green, but with the onset of his religious
crisis these pleasures had to be put aside. Dancing was the hardest to
relinquish - "I was a full year before I could quite leave it" - but he
eventually managed to achieve a fun-free life. In Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress,
carnival is the portal to Hell, just as pleasure in any form - sexual,
gustatory, convivial - is the devil's snare. Nothing speaks more clearly of the
darkening mood, the declining possibilities for joy, than the fact that, while
the medieval peasant created festivities as an escape from work, the Puritan
embraced work as an escape from terror.
We do not have to rely on psychological inference to draw a link between
Calvinism and depression. There is one clear marker for depression - suicide -
and suicide rates have been recorded, with varying degrees of diligence, for
centuries. In his classic study, Durkheim found that Protestants in the 19th
century - not all of whom, of course, were of the Calvinistic persuasion - were
about twice as likely to take their own lives as Catholics. More strikingly, a
recent analysis finds a sudden surge of suicide in the Swiss canton of Zurich,
beginning in the late 16th century, just as that region became a Calvinist
stronghold. Some sort of general breakdown of social mores cannot be invoked as
an explanation, since homicides fell as suicides rose.
So if we are looking for a common source of depression on the one hand, and the
suppression of festivities on the other, it is not hard to find. Urbanisation
and the rise of a competitive, market-based economy favoured a more anxious and
isolated sort of person - potentially both prone to depression and distrustful
of communal pleasures. Calvinism provided a transcendent rationale for this
shift, intensifying the isolation and practically institutionalising depression
as a stage in the quest for salvation. At the level of "deep, underlying
psychological change", both depression and the destruction of festivities could
be described as seemingly inevitable consequences of the broad process known as
modernisation. But could there also be a more straightforward link, a way in
which the death of carnival contributed directly to the epidemic of depression?
It may be that in abandoning their traditional festivities, people lost a
potentially effective cure for it. Burton suggested many cures for melancholy -
study and exercise, for example - but he returned again and again to the same
prescription: "Let them use hunting, sports, plays, jests, merry company ... a
cup of good drink now and then, hear musick, and have such companions with whom
they are especially delighted; merry tales or toys, drinking, singing, dancing,
and whatsoever else may procure mirth." He acknowledged the ongoing attack on
"Dancing, Singing, Masking, Mumming, Stage-plays" by "some severe Gatos,"
referring to the Calvinists, but heartily endorsed the traditional forms of
festivity: "Let them freely feast, sing and dance, have their Puppet-plays,
Hobby-horses, Tabers, Crowds, Bagpipes, &c, play at Ball, and Barley-breaks, and
what sports and recreations they like best." In his ideal world, "none shall be
over-tired, but have their set times of recreations and holidays, to indulge
their humour, feasts and merry meetings ..." His views accorded with treatments
of melancholy already in use in the 16th century. While the disruptively "mad"
were confined and cruelly treated, melancholics were, at least in theory, to be
"refreshed & comforted" and "gladded with instruments of musick".
A little over a century after Burton wrote The Anatomy of Melancholy, another
English writer, Richard Browne, echoed his prescription, backing it up with a
scientific (for the time) view of the workings of the human "machine". Singing
and dancing could cure melancholy, he proposed, by stirring up the "secretions".
And a century later, even Adam Smith, the great prophet of capitalism, was
advocating festivities and art as a means of relieving melancholy.
Burton, Browne and Smith were not the only ones to propose festivity as a cure
for melancholy, and there is reason to believe that whether through guesswork,
nostalgia, or personal experience, they were on to something important. I know
of no attempts in our own time to use festive behaviour as treatment for
depression, if such an experiment is even thinkable in a modern clinical
setting. There is, however, an abundance of evidence that communal pleasures
have served, in a variety of cultures, as a way of alleviating and even curing
The 19th-century historian JFC Hecker reports an example from 19th-century
Abyssinia, or what is now Ethiopia. An individual, usually a woman, would fall
into a kind of wasting illness, until her relatives agreed to "hire, for a
certain sum of money, a band of trumpeters, drummers, and fifers, and buy a
quantity of liquor; then all the young men and women of the place assemble at
the patient's house," where they dance and generally party for days, invariably
effecting a cure. Similarly, in 20th-century Somalia, a married woman afflicted
by what we would call depression would call for a female shaman, who might
diagnose possession by a "sar" spirit. Musicians would be hired, other women
summoned, and the sufferer cured through a long bout of ecstatic dancing with
the all-female group.
We cannot be absolutely sure in any of these cases - from 17th-century England
to 20th-century Somalia - that festivities and danced rituals actually cured the
disease we know as depression. But there are reasons to think that they might
have. First, because such rituals serve to break down the sufferer's sense of
isolation and reconnect him or her with the human community. Second, because
they encourage the experience of self-loss - that is, a release, however
temporary, from the prison of the self, or at least from the anxious business of
evaluating how one stands in the group or in the eyes of an ever-critical God.
Friedrich Nietzsche, as lonely and tormented an individual as the 19th century
produced, understood the therapeutics of ecstasy perhaps better than anyone
else. At a time of almost universal celebration of the "self", he alone dared
speak of the "horror of individual existence", and glimpsed relief in the
ancient Dionysian rituals that he knew of only from reading classics - rituals
in which, he imagined, "each individual becomes not only reconciled to his
fellow but actually at one with him".
The immense tragedy for Europeans, and most acutely for the northern Protestants
among them, was that the same social forces that disposed them to depression
also swept away a traditional cure. They could congratulate themselves for
brilliant achievements in the areas of science, exploration and industry, and
even convince themselves that they had not, like Faust, had to sell their souls
to the devil in exchange for these accomplishments. But with the suppression of
festivities that accompanied modern European "progress", they had done something
perhaps far more damaging: they had completed the demonisation of Dionysus begun
by Christians centuries ago, and thereby rejected one of the most ancient
sources of help - the mind-preserving, life-saving techniques of ecstasy.
· This is an edited extract from Dancing in the Streets:
A History of Collective
Joy by Barbara Ehrenreich,
published by Granta at £16.99. To buy a copy
for £15.99 with free p&p contact 0870 836 0875
Barbara Ehrenreich will be speaking with Geoff Dyer
at London's ICA tonight (www.ica.org.uk)
How we learned to stop
'Emotional abuse' affects one in three
Sunday September 17, 2006
home affairs editor
One in three adults say they suffered regular acts of 'emotional abuse' as
children, with many admitting they were terrified of their parents when growing
up. The disturbing findings, to be revealed in a report published tomorrow, have
led to claims that the issue of emotional abuse has been ignored by society - to
the detriment of a generation which has grown up with low self-esteem and
'Too often emotional abuse is not taken seriously when enormous damage is being
done to individuals and to society,' said Mary Marsh, chief executive of the
National Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children, the charity publishing
the report. 'We urgently need to address the scale and impact of emotional
maltreatment on the current generation of children. Parents who emotionally
abuse children systematically destroy their sense of worth and identity.
Children can grow up in despair and loneliness, constantly on edge - like being
trapped in a cage.'
The NSPCC interviewed almost 2,000 adults and found that of those who regularly
suffered emotional abuse, 33 per cent said it went on through their childhood.
Six in ten said the abuse gradually stopped only when they got older or left
More than half who claimed they were regularly abused said they had been
habitually shouted or screamed at, while almost one in fi ve said they were
often left afraid of their father or mother. A similar number said they were
often called stupid, lazy or worthless. One in 20 was regularly told: 'I wish
you were dead.'
Despite such prevalence, there is concern that abuse often goes ignored - the
charity found those working with children intervened to stop it only in one per
cent of cases.
As part of its Be The Full Stop campaign against child abuse, the NSPCC will
tomorrow call on the government to encourage greater awareness of the problem.
'Emotional abuse' affects one in three,
Related > Anglonautes >
Vocapedia > Health
mental health / psychology
Related > Anglonautes >
Beliefs, Emotions, Feelings, Mindset, Mood
Related > Anglonautes >
Vocapedia - warning: distressing
death > suicide, euthanasia / mercy killing
death > funeral, burial