USA > Gun violence >
Gun industry, Gun-makers
Anderson Manufacturing in Hebron, Ky
Cerberus Capital Management > Freedom group
private equity firm
run by the secretive financier
the most powerful and mysterious force
in the American commercial gun
a motley collection
of gun and ammunition firms
(Cerberus Capital Management)
had gathered together
under one umbrella company.
Gunmakers' town in crisis after shootings
home of Remington Arms
which makes the type of rifle
used in the Newtown massacre,
finds itself at the centre
of the gun control debate
gun maker / gun-maker
UK / USA
US gunmaker shares UK
gun maker > Beretta
gun making > 3 D printer
the two biggest gun manufacturers
Smith & Wesson and Sturm
Ruger & Co UK 2016
Sturm Ruger, one of the largest gunmakers in the U.S
Smith & Wesson UK /
Connecticut > gun manufacturing company > Colt
Connecticut > gun manufacturing company > Ruger
Sturm Ruger & Co
Connecticut > gun manufacturing company > Mossberg
protest > divestment
commerce-just-got-some-of-that-power-but-hasnt-gotten-the-whole-list - March
Corpus of news articles
USA > Gun violence >
Gun industry, Gun-makers
Investing in Guns
The New York Times
By JOE NOCERA
Cerberus Capital Management, the private equity firm run by the secretive
financier Steven Feinberg, set out to raise $6.5 billion in a new fund called
Cerberus Institutional Partners Series IV. Feinberg’s reputation for extracting
value from troubled companies — by replacing management, shuttering facilities
and creating “efficiencies” — was such that by May 2007, when the fund was
finally closed, it had gotten commitments for nearly $1 billion more than it had
Cerberus Institutional Partners Series IV is the fund that took over Chrysler in
2007. It bought General Motors’ financing arm, now called Ally Financial. It
gobbled up hospitals, purchased bus companies, and even bought the raunchy
It is also the fund that bought Bushmaster Firearms, the company that made the
assault weapon used by Adam Lanza to massacre 20 children and seven adults in
Newtown, Conn., last month. It bought Remington Arms, the maker of the
pump-action shotgun that was among the guns James Holmes used to kill 12 people
and wound 58 in Aurora, Colo. It bought a handful of other firearms companies,
which it then merged into a new parent company, Freedom Group. At which point,
Cerberus was the largest manufacturer of guns and ammunition in the country.
Not long ago, I obtained a partial list of the institutional investors that
committed money to the Cerberus fund. One of the investors, the California State
Teachers’ Retirement System, which put in $500 million, has already announced
that it will divest its gun holdings. “We shouldn’t be investing in things like
that,” says Bill Lockyer, the California state treasurer. He noted that assault
weapons are illegal in California.
Most of the other big investors, however, have kept their heads down. TIAA-CREF,
the financial services giant, committed $147.8 million to the Series IV fund.
(“No comment,” said a spokesman.) The State of Wisconsin Investment Board put up
$100 million. The University of Texas endowment made a $75 million commitment;
the Regents of the University of California kicked in $40 million; the
University of Missouri endowment was an investor. So were the Los Angeles Fire
and Police Pension system, the Indiana Public Retirement System, and the
Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System (which kicked in $400
million). And plenty of others.
When I called these investors to ask their rationale for investing in a fund
that financed a gun “roll-up,” as the Cerberus strategy is called, I got three
main responses. The first was that the percentage of their investment that went
to Freedom Group was minuscule. “We have a very small investment in Bushmaster,
which translates to about $1 million,” said Dianne Klein, a spokeswoman for the
University of California system. (She added that the California system was going
to divest its gun holdings.) Jennifer Hollingshead at the University of Missouri
told me that the endowment’s exposure was less than $450,000 — “which represents
about 0.01 percent of our total portfolio.”
The second response was that, as limited partners, the institutional investors
didn’t have a say in how Cerberus invested the money. The fact that Feinberg
decided to buy companies whose guns have repeatedly been used for mass slaughter
was, in effect, his decision to make.
The third was that the core duty of a pension fund or university endowment is to
maximize returns. Nobody made this point more vehemently than Bruce Zimmerman, a
spokesman for the University of Texas Investment Management Company. “We have no
plans to divest,” he said. “We invest strictly on economic considerations, and
we do not take into account social and political consideration.”
Cerberus never tried to hide what it was doing. And why would it? It was proud
of its gun strategy. It held annual meetings with its investors and talked
freely about Freedom Group. Investors were also aware that in 2010, Cerberus had
tried (and failed) to take Freedom Group public.
But until Newtown, none of the investors gave the business a second’s thought.
Aurora, Fort Hood, Wisconsin — and dozens of other mass slaughters — came and
went, and the investors stuck with Cerberus.
Newtown, it is often said, has changed that dynamic, sensitizing the country to
the insanity of its gun laws, and giving gun control advocates hope that reform
might finally be possible. But with the tragedy barely a month old, you can
already feel the pushback. Supporters of the National Rifle Association in
Congress are vowing to resist any effort to tighten the nation’s gun laws.
Gun-friendly state legislators are pushing absurd laws aimed at pre-empting
federal gun legislation. And then there are the investors, who have a unique
ability to push companies to change, if they so choose. (Just recall the South
What I learned this week is that, Newtown notwithstanding, too many of them have
other priorities. Making money is still more important that saving lives.
Investing in Guns,
Became the Big Shot
The New York Times
By NATASHA SINGER
LINED up in a gun rack beneath mounted deer heads is a Bushmaster Carbon 15, a
matte-black semiautomatic rifle that looks as if it belongs to a SWAT team. On
another rack rests a Teflon-coated Prairie Panther from DPMS Firearms, a
supplier to the United States Border Patrol and security agencies in Iraq. On a
third is a Remington 750 Woodsmaster, a popular hunting rifle.
The variety of rifles and shotguns on sale here at Cabela’s, the national
sporting goods chain, is a testament to America’s enduring gun culture. But, to
a surprising degree, it is also a testament to something else: Wall Street
In recent years, many top-selling brands — including the 195-year-old Remington
Arms, as well as Bushmaster Firearms and DPMS, leading makers of military-style
semiautomatics — have quietly passed into the hands of a single private company.
It is called the Freedom Group — and it is the most powerful and mysterious
force in the American commercial gun industry today.
Never heard of it?
You’re not alone. Even within gun circles, the Freedom Group is something of an
enigma. Its rise has been so swift that it has become the subject of wild
speculation and grassy-knoll conspiracy theories. In the realm of consumer
rifles and shotguns — long guns, in the trade — it is unrivaled in its size and
reach. By its own count, the Freedom Group sold 1.2 million long guns and 2.6
billion rounds of ammunition in the 12 months ended March 2010, the most recent
year for which figures are publicly available.
Behind this giant is Cerberus Capital Management, the private investment company
that first came to widespread attention when it acquired Chrysler in 2007.
(Chrysler later had to be rescued by taxpayers). With far less fanfare,
Cerberus, through the Freedom Group, has been buying big names in guns and ammo.
From its headquarters on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, Cerberus has
assembled a remarkable arsenal. It began with Bushmaster, which until recently
was based here in Maine. Unlike military counterparts like automatic M-16’s,
rifles like those from Bushmaster don’t spray bullets with one trigger pull.
But, with gas-powered mechanisms, semiautomatics can fire rapid follow-up shots
as fast as the trigger can be squeezed. They are often called “black guns”
because of their color. The police tied a Bushmaster XM15 rifle to shootings in
the Washington sniper case in 2002.
After Bushmaster, the Freedom Group moved in on Remington, which traces its
history to the days of flintlocks and today is supplying M24 sniper rifles to
the government of Afghanistan and making handguns for the first time in decades.
The group has also acquired Marlin Firearms, which turned out a special model
for Annie Oakley, as well as Dakota Arms, a maker of high-end big-game rifles.
It has bought DPMS Firearms, another maker of semiautomatic, military-style
rifles, as well as manufacturers of ammunition and tactical clothing.
“We believe our scale and product breadth are unmatched within the industry,”
the Freedom Group said in a filing last year with the Securities and Exchange
Here at Cabela’s, Mark Eliason, the vice president for sales and marketing at
Windham Weaponry, a new competitor of Bushmaster that was established by
Bushmaster’s founder, surveys the racks. He estimates that roughly 20 percent of
the long guns for sale here are made by Freedom Group companies. In the aisles,
he examines shelf upon shelf of ammunition. About a third of it comes from the
Freedom Group, he says.
“That’s a very large presence,” Mr. Eliason says.
So large, in fact, that rumors about the Freedom Group — what it is, and who is
behind it — have been circulating in the blogosphere. Some gun enthusiasts have
claimed that the power behind the company is actually George Soros, the
hedge-fund billionaire and liberal activist. Mr. Soros, these people have
warned, is buying American gun companies so he can dismantle the industry,
Second Amendment be damned.
The chatter grew so loud that the National Rifle Association issued a statement
in October denying the rumors.
“N.R.A. has had contact with officials from Cerberus and Freedom Group for some
time,” the N.R.A. assured its members. “The owners and investors involved are
strong supporters of the Second Amendment and are avid hunters and shooters.”
Mr. Soros isn’t behind the Freedom Group, but, ultimately, another financier is:
Stephen A. Feinberg, the chief executive of Cerberus.
part of one of the signature Wall Street businesses of the past decade: private
equity. Buyout kings like Mr. Feinberg, 51, try to acquire undervalued
companies, often with borrowed money, fix them up and either take them public or
sell at a profit to someone else.
Before the financial crisis of 2008, scores of well-known American companies,
from Chrysler down, passed into the hands of private-equity firms. For the
financiers, the rewards were often enormous. But some companies that they
acquired later ran into trouble, in part because they were burdened with debt
from the takeovers.
Mr. Feinberg, a Princeton graduate who began his Wall Street career at Drexel
Burnham Lambert, the junk bond powerhouse of Michael R. Milken fame, got into
private equity in 1992. That year, he and William L. Richter founded Cerberus,
which takes its name from the three-headed dog in Greek mythology that guards
the gates of Hades.
Today, Mr. Feinberg presides over a private empire that rivals some of the
mightiest public companies in the land. Cerberus manages more than $20 billion
in capital. Together, the companies it owns generate annual revenue of about $40
billion — more than either Amazon or Coca-Cola last year.
Why Cerberus went after gun companies isn’t clear. Many private investment firms
shy away from such industries to avoid scaring off big investors like pension
Yet, in many ways, the move is classic Cerberus. Mr. Feinberg has a history of
investing in companies that other people may not want, but that Cerberus
believes it can turn around. When Cerberus embarked on its acquisition spree in
guns, it essentially had the field to itself.
“There’s much less competition for buying these companies,” says Steven N.
Kaplan, a professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and a
private equity expert. “They must have decided there is an opportunity to make
money by investing in the firearms industry and trying to build a big company.”
Whatever the reason, Cerberus, through the Freedom Group, is now a major player.
It may come as a surprise to many people, given the prominence of guns in
American culture, the national conversation and politics, but the commercial
firearms market in the United States is actually relatively small. Sales of guns
and ammunition total about $4 billion annually, according to estimates from the
National Shooting Sports Foundation, an industry trade group.
True, the N.R.A. estimates that about 70 million to 80 million Americans
collectively own 300 million firearms. But how many of those people buy new guns
regularly? For companies like the Freedom Group, the challenge is to expand the
market. These days, more women are involved in target shooting, according to
participation reports from the National Sporting Goods Association. But,
analysts say, many young men who in the past might have taken up game hunting
are now more interested in other pursuits like online gaming.
So, to keep growing, the Freedom Group has expanded its sales staff in the
United States and increased its business internationally. It has sold weapons to
the governments of Afghanistan, Thailand, Mexico and Malaysia, among others, and
obtained new business from the United States Army, including a contract worth up
to $28.2 million, to upgrade the M24 sniper weapon system.
Cerberus brings some connections to the table. The longtime chairman of its
global investments group is Dan Quayle, the former vice president. The Freedom
Group, meantime, has added two retired generals to its board. One is George A.
Joulwan, who retired from the Army after serving as Supreme Allied Commander of
Europe. The other is Michael W. Hagee, formerly commandant of the Marine Corps.
Jessica Kallam, a spokeswoman at the Freedom Group, said executives there
declined to comment for this article. Timothy Price, a managing director of
Cerberus, also declined to comment.
THE old Bushmaster factory in Windham, Me., doesn’t look like much. With a
facade of brick and gray aluminum siding, it squats in an unassuming office park
on the Roosevelt Trail.
But Cerberus representatives who arrived here in 2005 clearly saw potential.
Inside, several dozen gunsmiths, working by hand, were fitting together 6,000 to
7,000 weapons a month. At the time, Bushmaster was thriving, though it had been
stung by bad publicity stemming from the Beltway sniper shootings. (In a 2004
settlement with victims of the shootings and their families, Bull’s Eye Shooter
Supply, the store where the gun was acquired, agreed to pay $2 million, and
Bushmaster agreed to pay $568,000, but they did not admit liability.)
Richard Dyke, then the principal owner and chairman of Bushmaster, welcomed the
visitors from New York. A blunt-spoken Korean War veteran and Republican
fund-raiser, he had made a fortune himself by buying companies in trouble,
including one that made poker chips. In 1976, he bought a bankrupt gun maker in
Bangor, Me., for $241,000, moved it to Windham and later changed its name to
The company that Mr. Dyke bought had patents on semiautomatic weapons designed
for the military and police. But he was drawn to the nascent market in
military-style firearms for civilians. He saw as his customers precision target
shooters, including current and former military personnel, police officers and,
well, military wannabes, he says.
A Bushmaster Carbon 15 .223 semiautomatic is about three feet long. But,
weighing in at just under six pounds, it is surprisingly easy to maneuver, even
for a novice. It doesn’t have to be recocked after it’s fired: you just squeeze
the trigger over and over.
“At 25 meters, if you are a decent shot,” Mr. Dyke says, “you can put it into a
bull’s-eye that is the size of a quarter.”
The Bushmaster brand began to grow in the 1980s after the company started
supplying its semiautomatics to police departments. It won a much larger
consumer following in the 1990s, after it landed several small military
Bushmaster was among the first to sell ordinary people on weapons that look and
feel like the ones carried by soldiers. Today many gun makers have embraced
military-style weapons, a major but controversial source of growth for the
commercial gun market, says Tom Diaz, a senior policy analyst at the Violence
Policy Center, a research group that backs gun control.
“It’s clear that the militarized stuff is the stuff that sells and is defining
the industry,” Mr. Diaz says.
Mr. Dyke says he’s not sure why Bushmaster caught the eye of Cerberus. Whatever
the case, when Cerberus came calling, Mr. Dyke, then past 70, was ready to sell.
At the time, Bushmaster had $85 million in annual sales and about several
million dollars in debt, he says. In April 2006, he sold the company to Cerberus
for about $76 million, he says, and Cerberus rented the Bushmaster plant here
for five years.
The next year, Cerberus formed the Freedom Group.
Now Bushmaster is gone from Maine. Earlier this year, Mr. Dyke says, the Freedom
Group notified him it was closing Bushmaster’s operation in the state and moving
it to a bigger plant owned by Remington, a typical consolidation play for a
private investment firm looking to cut costs and increase efficiency. Remington,
for its part, announced earlier this year that it was expanding its
manufacturing capacity and hiring new employees to make Bushmasters.
Several months ago, Mr. Dyke started a new company, Windham Weaponry, at the old
Bushmaster site and has rehired most of his former employees. But he’s not
planning to go head-to-head with the Freedom Group.
“It’s the big gorilla in the room,” he says, adding: “We don’t have to do $100
million. We’d have hopes of doing $20 million.”
has been producing guns since 1816, when, according to lore, a young man named
Eliphalet Remington made a flintlock rifle in his father’s forge in Ilion Gulch,
in upstate New York. By the 1870s, the brand was so popular that the company
diversified into typewriters.
In 2007, the Freedom Group swooped in and bought Remington for $370 million,
including $252 million in assumed debt. In one stroke, the Freedom Group gained
one of the most famous names in American firearms, the largest domestic maker of
shotguns and rifles and a major manufacturer of ammunition.
“That caused a lot of stir in the industry,” says Dean J. Lockwood, a weapons
systems analyst at Forecast International, a market research firm.
Next, the Freedom Group in rapid succession went after other firearms companies:
DPMS; Marlin Firearms, a classic maker that came with two niche shotgun brands,
Harrington & Richardson and L. C. Smith; and Dakota Arms. The Freedom Group also
bought S&K industries, which supplies wood and laminate for gun stocks, as well
as the Advanced Armament Corporation, which makes silencers. It acquired Barnes
Bullets, which makes copper-jacketed bullets popular with precision shooters and
The more the company diversifies its portfolio, analysts say, the more it has to
offer to firearms distributors and leading retailers like Wal-Mart and Cabela’s.
“You can see Freedom Group constantly expanding its manufacturing base,” Mr.
Lockwood says. “You don’t want to be a one-trick pony. They are trying to get as
far into the market as they can.” What is left? The Freedom Group does not own
the Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation or Sturm, Ruger, both publicly traded.
Nor does it own the Colt’s Manufacturing, which is privately owned.
Cerberus also does not own Winchester Repeating Arms or Browning, both part of
the Herstal Group of Belgium.
Still, the Freedom Group has ingested so many well-known brands so quickly that
some gun owners are uneasy about what it might do next. Two years ago, a
Cerberus managing director, George Kollitides, ran for the board of the N.R.A.
Despite an endorsement from Remington, and the fact that he was a director of
the Freedom Group and Remington, he lost. His campaign didn’t sit well with some
gun bloggers, who viewed him as an industry interloper.
Andrew Arulanandam, the N.R.A.’s director for public affairs, declined to
speculate about why Mr. Kollitides lost. “It’s a great question to ask our four
million members,” he said.
challenges for gun makers in America go far beyond those faced by many other
companies. As in many industries, sales tend to rise and fall with the economy.
But firearms makers must also grapple with the vicissitudes of politics and
Many Americans are solidly behind the right to own guns. In a Gallup poll
conducted in October, only 43 percent of respondents said they supported
stricter gun laws — an all-time low since the company first asked the question
in 1990. And 47 percent reported that there was a gun in their home or on their
property, the highest level of self-reported gun ownership since 1993, according
to the poll, which canvassed about 1,000 adults in early October.
Earlier this month, the House of Representatives passed a “right to carry” bill
that would require states to recognize one another’s permits to carry concealed
weapons. If the bill passes the Senate, people in states with weaker
concealed-weapon regulations would be able to carry concealed handguns into
states like California, which requires extensive background checks.
The development would be good news for handgun makers like Colt and Smith &
Wesson, but wouldn’t be much help to the Freedom Group, which focuses on long
That, however, may be changing. Not long ago, Remington introduced the Remington
1911 R1, its first pistol in decades. Industry analysts speculate that the
Freedom Group might next go shopping for a handgun maker to expand its presence
in that segment of the market.
“At the right price,” says Jim Barrett, an analyst at CL King who covers
firearms companies, “it would be logical for them to be interested in one of the
premier handgun manufacturers.”
But, in an industry with few independent players left, the big question is this:
What is Freedom Group’s long-term strategy? Because the company is private,
outsiders can only speculate.
The Freedom Group had planned to go public, but backed away earlier this year
when the financial markets turned turbulent. As of the end of September, the
company had nearly half a billion dollars in debt, according to a third-quarter
earnings report available on the Freedom Group’s Web site. That includes about
$225 million in debt that the company raised last year to pay itself a special
dividend used to buy back preferred stock from Cerberus, according to a company
prospectus filed with the S.E.C.
Some analysts say tactical rifles have peaked, that the market has topped out,
and that small, concealable handguns are the way forward for the near future.
And yet, after a tough 2010, gun sales at the Freedom Group were up 5.6 percent
during the first nine months of this year, although the company reported a net
loss of $6.3 million for the same time period, according to the company’s most
recent earnings report.
Meantime, the Freedom Group, despite its place atop the industry, appears to be
operating without an official chief executive of its own. Its most recent
C.E.O., Theodore H. Torbeck, resigned in September 2010 and no replacement has
been named. For the moment, a temporary office of the chief executive, led by
Robert L. Nardelli, the Cerberus executive who oversaw Chrysler, is helping to
lead the company
“It’s a sensible strategy to roll up things,” says Gautam Khanna, an aerospace
and military industry analyst at Cowen & Company. The issue is whether the
Freedom Group, and Cerberus, can persuade more Americans to buy more guns.
“That,” Mr. Khanna says, “is an open question.”
How Freedom Group Became the Big Shot,
Related > Anglonautes >
gun violence > USA
gun violence > police shootings > USA
violence, abuse, prostitution,
sexual violence, rape, harassment,
kidnapping, crime, police,
arrest, investigation, custody,
police misconduct / brutality / violence > USA
drugs > Mexico, UK, USA
cyberbullying, online abuse / violence
U.S. Constitution > Second Amendment
Related > Anglonautes > Videos > Documentaries > USA
2020s > Gun
culture, gun violence, gun control
2010s > Gun culture, gun violence, gun control
Related > Anglonautes > History >
century > America, USA
20th century >
USA > Civil rights
17th, 18th, 19th, 20th century
English America, America, USA
Abolition, Civil war,
17th, 18th, 19th century
English America, America, USA